Thursday, December 08, 2005

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe: Movie Review

Summary
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe lives up to its promise as one of the most anticipated movies of the year, bringing to the big screen the first of the seven beloved children’s tales by C.S. Lewis.


The movie is opening with great expectations. Christians are looking forward to a “Christian” fantasy epic movie to rival The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and the Harry Potter series. They also hope this will be the first of seven movies to be made.

Disney is hoping that the movie will sell well, both among Christians and non-Christians. Disney has yet to have a hit movie franchise in the fantasy genre, and would very much desire this to be it. They’re investing $150 million to find out. Sales of The Chronicles of Narnia books, which now stands at 85 million copies and second only to the Harry Potter series, will receive a boost with the movie’s premiere.

Many non-Christians are rediscovering their love for the fantasy world of Narnia. One atheist shared that he read the books as a child, loved them. But when he grew up, he learned that the books were a thinly-veiled version of Christianity and spent a lot of effort “trying to get it out of his system.” However, seeing the live-action movie is rekindling the childlike fascination for this fantasy world. Not everyone is happy though to see the movie made, and controversies already abound about whether the movie is abused by Christians to teach more than what the author intended.


Synopsis
Based on the second book in the Narnia chronology (though Lewis wrote this one first), The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe tells the story of four children who pass through a special wardrobe and discover the kingdom of Narnia. Narnia is a land of talking animals and mythical creatures under the White Witch's spell of everlasting winter. Fearing that an ancient prophecy has come true, and that the children are Narnia's chosen rulers, the witch tricks the youngest brother into betraying his family. Only Aslan, the true King of Narnia, can help them defeat the wtich and restore Narnia and help them claim their places on the thrones.

Narnia fans will appreciate the overall fidelity to the book by director Andrew Adamson, though he does add additional scenes such as the Blitzkreig in the film’s opening, the chase by the wolves, the extended battle scenes (in the book it is a mere 1.5 pages), The movie touts excellent CGI special efects by some of the same crew who work on The Lord of the Rings. Incidentally, most of the movie was filmed on location in New Zealand, similar to LOTR.

Personal Take
I have been a Narnia fan ever since I read the books when I was 13 years old. I was so fascinated by Lewis’ books that I went on to read his other fiction (Science Trilogy, Till We Have Faces, The Dark Tower, etc.). I have seen the BBC made-for-television movies and the animated version. This movie by Walden Media and Disney is easily the best movie version.
The movie is rated PG and while there are plenty of battle scenes, the emphasis is on action and not gore, hardly any blood at all. I watched the movie during an early preview screening in Houston held by Disney and Disney Radio. There were plenty of young children but I remember only one boy crying. He was approximately two or three years old and was probably tired. The movie is over 130 minutes long. Children who are familiar with the Narnia story will have no problem getting absorbed in the story. I wuld say that young boys would probably like the movie better than younger girls. This is because the movie is presented as action, with the Battle of Beruna as the climax of the movie. In the book, the emphasis is more on Aslan’s sacrifice at the Stone Table, but the movie gives equal weight to both the Stone Table and the the battle scenes.


The CG animation is excellent and many of the creatures from Narnian lore as well as additional ones from the director and scriptwriter’s imagination are done realistically. The CG-created Aslan delivers as both awe-inspiring (raaaaaarrrrr!!!) as well as approachable. The dialogue is very good, with touches of humor added in several instances.

Spoilers and Possible Disappointments for Narnia Purists
The theatrical license taken is acceptable in general. The following are notable changes in the movie that are different from the book:
  1. Opening scene of the Blitzkrieg (bombing over London) which is implied but not described in the book.
  2. When Lucy finds the wardrobe, it is covered by a large cloth.
  3. The much-quoted description by C.S. Lewis of the children’s reactions at the first mention of Aslan’s name did not fare well in the movie. The camera panned over the children’s faces, but they could not emote through the film the same kind of thoughts that Lewis wrote about.
  4. The conversation between the children and Mr. Beaver is cut short, omitting the part where Aslan is revealed to be a lion and the children worry if he was safe, and Mr. Beaver answering, “ ’Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good.”
  5. The three siblings followed Edmund and watches from a distance as he enters the White Witch’s castle.
  6. An exciting chase through the woods and the river by Maugrim and the wolves.
  7. Edmund and Mr. Tumnus meeting in the White Witch’s dungeon before the faun is turned to stone.
  8. The army of Aslan is camped all throughout at the Fords of Beruna in the movie while in the book they were originally camped at the Stone Table but moved away later.
  9. The meeting of the White Witch and the forest creatures is omitted from the movie. Instead, the fox plays a role in misleading the wolves during the chase.
  10. In the movie, Aslan explains his resurrection as part of the Deep Magic which is written on the Stone Table but the White Witch failed to understand. In the book, Aslan explains that his resurrection is part of the Deeper Magic From Before the Dawn of Time that the White Witch did not know about.
  11. The petrified Mr. Tumnus is in the courtyard along with the other statues and he is the first to be revived by Aslan. The book has Mr. Tumnus located upstairs in the castle and being revived later.
  12. When Aslan leaves Narnia after the coronation, instead of Mr. Beaver explaining that Aslan’s “not a tame lion,” Mr. Tumnus relates this to Lucy.
  13. Douglas Gresham, step-son of C.S. Lewis, who serves as a producer in the film, relates one dialogue that was changed: “… battles are ugly when women fight” changed to “… battles are ugly.” (I did not notice this in the movie when I watched it.) In the movie, the two Pevensie sisters do not join the battle, but many other Narnian womenfolk do.
For me, the major departure from the book is the film’s development of the main characters. When I read the book, it seemed to me that the main character is always Aslan and I got to know him through the initial mention of his name, his first meeting with the children, and so on. The children for me are the supporting cast. But in the movie, Aslan’s dialogue is minimal and the children are the ones presented with well-developed characterization. They changed and grow through their experiences in Narnia.
Peter feels burdened with his responsibility of being oldest and is anxious whether he could fulfill, first, his mother’s trust and then second, Aslan’s charge to him, grows in his confidence both as a warrior and a leader. Edmund is introduced in the story as a misfit among his siblings and makes the mistake of letting his greed take over his good sense. He later learns the tragic consequences of his mistake and becomes just as valiant as Peter and is pivotal in his selfless actions that turned the tide of the battle. Susan is pragmatic and cautious, who prefers the safety of the Professor’s house in the countryside than to assuming responsibility of fulfilling the prophecy. She learns from Lucy’s example to accept her role in Narnia.
Lucy is the girl whose face of wonder when she first steps into the magical world of Narnia is my favorite scene of the movie. (I read that they flew Georgie Henley to another location that was snowing. She was blindfolded and the cameras were rolling as the blindfold was taken off, capturing her surprise and wonder at the snowy wonderland.) She shows unprejudiced friendship with the faun and open trust of Aslan and the Narnians, and still later, the greatest empathy and love for Aslan.
Considerations to Take Into Account Before Viewing
C.S. Lewis was a professor of medieval literature and a lover of all sorts of mythology. The Chronicles of Narnia are replete with mythological creatures (i.e., dryads, naiads, fauns, centaurs, flying horse, unicorns, werewolves, giants, ogres, trolls, witches, dwarves, Father Christmas, etc). Some depiction of the White Witch’s army can be scary, but the camera doesn’t dwell on them.
While Christians may be eager to draw conclusions comparing Aslan to Jesus, we should remember that the the teaching aim is not to get children worshipping Aslan. Aslan is still a figment of the imagination, albeit a very Christlike imaginary redeemer-figure. Instead, the best explanation for your children is to acknowledge that Aslan and Narnia are fantasy and as such, imaginary. Focus the moral on Edmund’s sin and what was required to bring forgiveness.
Don’t try to draw analogies from every detail in the book to the Christian life. The Chronicles of Narnia are also not meant to be theological books. C.S. Lewis, while being an excellent Christian writer who is able to articulate well his beliefs in layman’s terms, did have some theological notions that not all evangelicals would agree with.
Ministry Application
One way of drawing positive teaching from the movie is to have children identify themselves with the four Pevensie children and how they grow or change. Peter is noble and a protector, but he dislikes Edmund and easily “gets cross” with him. Susan is overly cautious and is not willing to respect Peter’s leadership. She eventually learns to trust Aslan’s arrangement and the words of the prophecy. Edmund is selfish and greedy in the beginning but acquits himself in the end with his selfless act to save Peter from the White Witch. Lucy’s trust and love of Aslan is an example to children of trust in God.
While comparisons have been made to Edmund as the betrayer (“Judas”), he is probably more like the disciple Peter. Peter betrayed Jesus but was restored. Edmund also finds restoration. Another spiritual comparison is that Edmund is the prodigal son in Luke 15. Note the differences between Peter Pevensie and the prodigal’s brother.
There are many other ways that this movie could be used in children's ministry. The character of Aslan and his Christlike qualities can be explored to teach about Christ. I worry though about drawing the line from Aslan to Christ for young preschoolers. When my children first heard the story (through Focus on the Family’s Radio Theatre audio CD version), my daughter Anne (then 8-years old) was the one who drew the comparison rather than my pointing it out to them.
For other ideas on using the movie in teaching children, see the Kidology Narnia discussion.

Thursday, October 20, 2005


Dreamer. Check out the Family Activities site. Posted by Picasa

Dreamer, A Family Movie. Hurrah!

(Spoiler) Be warned. This post is a partial rant.

BTW, folks, there's a new movie coming out tomorrow that stars Kurt Russell and Dakota Fanning, titled Dreamer from Dreamworks. It appears to be a pretty good family movie. I will have to check out the story and let you know.

I think Anne will like this film, especially because of the injured horse who gets a comeback. She likes horses and used to sketch them, although she's moved on to other interests by now. My friend Brent though has a daughter who has a long-term relationship with horses. She should enjoy this movie. Hey Brent, maybe you can stay after church to watch the movie on Sunday. (Pastor Brent's church meets at a movie theater).

For now, I'm just grateful for good movie alternatives on the big screen that you can take your family to. I'm normally a cheapskate with movies. I tend to wait for the DVD to come out if I can and just save my money. But really, if we don't go to the theaters to watch good family movies, and the movies don't make money, who's going to want to make wholesome movies. And admit it, a lot of people (Christians) paid good money to watch the Star Wars franchise, buy Star Wars toys and memorabilia, and give support to George Lucas and the Force.

Why can't we support the good family movies and in this way, encourage more good movies to be made? I hate to say it but the argument is usually true that while Christians bemoan the fact that most movies are antagonistic to their faith and that Hollywood doesn't cater to the Christian public, they don't back up their whining with their pocketbook (also checkbook, credit cards, and cash).

Enough of the rant and back to the movie. Check out the Dreamer website that includes activities for the family. You can choose the family faith activities or a small group discussion guide written by Fuller Theological Seminary's Reel Spirituality.

Also click here for an ecard and the music video based on the movie title sung by Bethany Dillon. You can send the ecard to your friends. Lyrics are copied here.

Love woke me up this morning
With a memory
Love came and whispered a story
That awakened a dream

Imagine a beautiful castle
And a beautiful king
He left the comfort of his throne
To fight for victory

(Chorus)
I am a dreamer
Take me higher
Open the sky up
Start a fire
I believe
Even if it's just a dream

Love woke me up this morning
And I ran to see
The king in the winners' circle
On the horse he won for me

(Chorus)

Only a king would do anything
To protect the kingdom
Only a king would do anything
To protect the kingdom
Only a king would do anything
To protect the kingdom

(Chorus)

CT article on the rise and fall of Big Idea

Found this link at Phil Vischer's site to the Christianity Today article onBig Idea's bankrupty and sale. I like the fact that the article focused on the person rather than the company.

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/005/4.44.html

Wednesday, October 19, 2005


Remember Kevin of the Space Penguins? The only place you can find him nowadays is at bigideafun. Posted by Picasa

When Bob (the Tomato) Met Larry (the Cucumber)

The meteoric rise and fall of Vischer and company.

I wonder how many people were aware of the true story behind Big Idea, the company that gave us Veggie Tales. This seems to be a good time to talk about this now that the latest addition, Lord of the Beans, is coming out next week.

The story relates how Phil Vischer and Mike Nawrocki started the first Veggie Tale video with their seemingly last pennies, plus the charity of Christians they knew. Then success knocked on the door, and for a while it seemed like nothing could stop the veggies from taking over the world (of children's entertainment). But success became its own trap as ambitions overcame common sense and good business practices. Soon Big Idea was faced with having to initiate corporate lay-offs, a devastating lawsuit, imminent bankruptcy and finally, the sale of Big Idea following the lawsuit defeat in Dallas. Since then, Big Idea has been bought by another media company and its leadership reorganized. With most employees laid off, a core group of its writers and artists led by Mike have moved to Tennessee from Chicago. Phil Vischer today remains a contributor to the videos though no longer officially employed, more like a sub-contractor.

Through it all, the production and sale of the videos has seemingly gone uninterrupted. I did wonder why 3-2-1 Penguins and and Larry-Boy ended their video series.

I have used Veggie Tales in our children's ministry without missing a beat since 1994 and was quite unaware of the big picture (or idea). I had actually read of the lawsuit and the business problems and possible lay-offs. But the success of the Jonah movie and continued subsequent release of other videos led me to make assumptions that everything was working out. After all, Big Idea wasn't just a company, it was a ministry too.

The reason I wanted to bring this up is that I had actually paid much attention to the rise and fall of another company during the same time, a company that exhibited a similar meteoric rise and fall. However, in retrospect I now realize that I don't have any real interest in Enron as I do with Big Idea. I don't own Enron stocks or understand much of its business trading power and how it cheated its books, etc. But I do understand Bob and Larry, 3-2-1 Penguins, and Larry-Boy. And so, I ask myself: How could I have missed it? Did I not see the signs? Is there anyone writing a book on this?

Needless to say, I am now in breathless anticipation of the book or movie, whichever comes first.

(While you're waiting for the book like me, you can read the 22-part "What Killed Big Idea?" behind-the-scenes story from Phil's POV on www.philvischer.com)

Thursday, October 06, 2005

Web-surfing: Children Matters and other articles

Browsing through the web this week I came across the Chinese Coordination Centre on World Evangelization (CCCOWE) website and took the time to browse through their online publication, Chinese Around the World.

I vaguely remember reading CATW regularly about twenty years ago while working as a part-time youth ministry staff/church librarian at United Evangelical Church of the Philippines. UECP was actively involved with CCCOWE as one of the associate pastors, Rev. Wesley Chang, served with CCCOWE in an official capacity.

This recent issue of CATW (Sept. 2005) had the theme "Children Matters" and that definitely caught my eye. It was refreshing to read how Chinese churches outside of North America were approaching children's ministry. There are a few articles of interest that represent significant progress in the thinking within the Chinese Christian community concerning the necessity and role of children's ministry in the church.

Children's Ministry and the Kingdom of Heaven by Anna Hui
Children's Ministry in Australia by Nancy Fung
Age Limit for the School of Mission by Lisa Chan
Children in Taiwan by Jennifer Su

Another article that caught my eye came from National Religious Broadcaster's NRB Magazine. Thom S. Rainer wrote an article titled "10 Predictions for the Church by 2010." Two trends are noteworthy to someone involved in children's ministry as myself. Trend #8: An increase in intentional evangelistic ministries focused on children and youth and Trend #10: The emergence of a children’s minister as the third full-time staff minister. Download a copy of the article at this link:

As Rainer said, undoubtedly these two trends are linked together as churches recognize the need and success of intentional ministries to the younger generation, they will want to find ministerial staff to lead those ministries.

Coming up soon, a list of blogs that I would recommend.